Utah Lands Transfer Part 2 - The Scam is Official

by Enoch Moore 26. September 2013 07:02

I initially wrote this post about Utah's recent bill, The Transfer of Public Lands Act of 2012, that demands the federal government give all lands in the state of Utah back to Utah.

The first post mainly pointed out that the language of the bill was very heavy on Agenda 21 keywords and phrases and that potentially unelected representatives were being set up to make decisions.  Well now that some more time has passed the evidence has grown stronger.

First let us also clarify that recently Utah passed a resolution that officially recognized and rejected Agenda 21 in the bill SJR 11 2013 sponsored by Todd Weiler.  So we have no excuse for being ignorant of Agenda 21.  This bill specifically defines the threat to our freedoms and constitution.  I recommend reading the bill but here are the highlighted provisions:

Highlighted Provisions:
             13          This resolution:
             14          .    rejects United Nations Agenda 21, both its intent and its potential for abuse;
             15          .    urges Utah's state agencies and political subdivisions to not adopt or implement
             16      policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private
             17      property rights without due process;
             18          .    urges Utah's state agencies and political subdivisions to not adopt or develop
             19      environmental and developmental policies that, without due process, would infringe
             20      or restrict the private property rights of property owners;
             21          .    urges state and local governments across the United States to be well informed
             22      regarding the underlying harmful implications of implementing United Nations
             23      Agenda 21's strategies for "sustainable development";
             24          .    urges state and local governments across the United States to not enter into any
             25      agreement, expend any sum of money, contract services, or give financial aid to those nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations affiliated with Agenda 21;
             27          .    urges state and local governments across the United States to reject United Nations
             28      Agenda 21 and any grant money or financial aid attached to it; and
             29          .    urges support for locally directed regional planning efforts that protect local
             30      sovereignty and private property rights.

 

So let's make it clear that our state legislature has done a very good thing by officially recognizing this.  Now let's also be clear that if we let any Agenda 21 policies into any part of our state we have violated this resolution.  Let's hold our elected representatives accountable according to this joint resolution that they passed.  We have a starting point to legitimately demand action in any part of our state with this and nobody can say an official joint resolution of the state legislature is a conspiracy theory.

Back to the Transfer of Public Lands Act of 2012.  The bill established that the "Constitutional Defense Council" would create a report to present to the state legislature.  This report was completed on Nov 14th, 2012.  The contents of this report stink of Agenda 21 like nothing else.  At the end of the report, page 68 has a list of "CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE UTAH LEGISLATURE"...  this is recommended legislation...  Some can be explained away as potentially innocent recommendations, but others absolutely cannot.  I have attached a copy of this report to the bottom of this blog post for anyone to download.

As we look at these recommendations, let's remember the words from Utah's Joint Resolution to not implement recommendations and policies, considering even only the intent of Agenda 21, deliberate or inadvertent.

  1. Create a county indemnification fund to guarantee that counties experience no net-loss of revenue as a result of a transfer of lands.
  2. Review and modify existing State park designations, clearly distinguishing between historic and cultural parks, outdoor recreation-focused parks, and sport-related parks (golf courses).
  3. Increase funding for existing State parks to further demonstrate Utah’s commitment to conserving and protecting its natural landscapes.
  4. Significantly increase funding for the LeRay McAllister Critical Land Conservation Fund to provide resources for State-led conservation efforts to protect agricultural lands, wildlife habitat, watershed protection, and other culturally or historically unique landscapes.
    (By going through this fund as a 3rd party, private property rights can more easily be threatened.  See diagram below for the direct connection on this.)

  5. Consider proposing mechanisms to guarantee that all or a portion of new revenues that may be obtained after taking ownership of the lands are dedicated to fund education or other priorities as established by the Utah Legislature.
  6. Create a Utah State Wilderness Act that outlines the way high-conservation value lands would be managed under State control.
    (This makes me think of the Wildlands Project, which SJR11 recognized, which is a national initiative that aims to put over half the United States off limits to human beings)
  7. Create a Utah State public lands management policy act that outlines an open and public process for land management decisions in Utah that demonstrates a continued commitment to keeping public lands open.
  8. Prior to any transfer of lands, pre-designate wilderness or other conservation areas through State law so that when any lands are transferred to the state, the public knows the preservation management regime under which the new State lands will be managed.
    (So before the transfer is even performed, there will first be chunks of land already set as off limits)
  9. Clarify and strengthen the Utah Energy Zones legislation that passed last session to ensure that areas ripe with energy resources are managed in a way that will prioritize responsible development of the Utah's energy resources.
    (While this can arguably be an innocent statement, this makes me think of the progressive war on energy production.  Depending on which direction this is "clarified", we ought to remember the Sierra Club's officially written objectives to eliminate coal production from the United States)
  10. Study and consider key conservation areas or ecosystems within Utah that may be transferred to non-profit environmental organizations for management under a long-term lease.
    (How more obvious can this be?  We will give 3rd party "non profits" "long term" control?)
  11. Actively publicize and reiterate Article 18 of the Utah State Constitution which states: “The Legislature shall enact laws to prevent the destruction of and to preserve the Forests on the lands of the State, and upon any part of the public domain, the control of which may be conferred by Congress upon the State.” This provision not only clearly contemplates that it was anticipated that lands were to be transferred to the State, but it also demonstrates that Utahns have always recognized the importance of preserving and caring for forest lands.
  12. Study and consider adopting a highest or best-use (preferential-use) management regime for areas instead of the current multiple-use model.
  13. Organize with other Western States to pursue a regional agenda for western management of western public lands.
    ("Regional government" is a major component in the "intent" of Agenda 21. Ken Ivory has been traveling the western states spreading this whole land initiative regionally.  A regionalized government takes control over city and state government.)
  14. Undertake, through the Public Lands Commission to be created, a full study identifying both the direct and indirect costs of land management in addition to the revenue expectations that can be derived from the public lands within Utah.
  15. Instigate an active and robust coordination effort with western Governors and members of Congressional delegations from the West to facilitate a process that would allow for and expedite large-scale land exchanges and re-designations.
    (Coordinate in a regional manner again...  here is the intent of Agenda 21)
  16. Explore the option of utilizing the Interstate Compact Clause of the United States Constitution to enter into a congressionally approved regional compact under which that Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands in the West are transferred to Western States under a public trust. States agreeing to the compact and trust agreement would pledge to keep the vast majority of lands open to public access and to manage for sustainable prosperity and conservation.
    (I am not an expert on trusts, but if the lands are tranferred in a public trust to the western states, does that mean the western states own the lands as a region instead of each state owning their lands independently?)
  17. Urge the United States Congress to create a twenty-first century public land law review commission to begin to systematically address the basic structural problems that plague current public land management.
  18. Statutorily limit the sale of any lands transferred to Utah from the federal government to a private entity without legislative approval.
    (So this would ban any private purchasing of these lands without the state legislature approving.  Nobody could buy any of the lands for private commercial uses without working with the state legislature.  Is this ultimately any different than the Agenda 21 public/private partnership model that is also taking over schools and healthcare?)
  19. Identify areas that may be managed most effectively by SITLA.

 

So those are some of the clear concerns.  I am not a legal expert, and don't claim to be, but it is clear that the sustainable development principles and intentions have come out in this bill and our legislature has urged all government entities to not implement recommendations and principles of sustainable development connected to Agenda 21.

In conclusion:

Yes, let's take our federal lands back.  But let us honor our resolution to not implement Agenda 21.  Honor the constitution not the UN charter.  We need to insist that any official who knowingly lets these principles come through answer to why they are doing it and how they reconcile what they're supporting against the anti-Agenda 21 resolution, SJR11 2013.

 

 

Here is the report to read for yourself if desired: CDC-AGLandsTransferHB148.pdf (5.76 mb)

Tags: , ,

Agenda 21 | Constitution | Liberty Analysis | Utah Politics

Comments (3) -

Doug Heaton
Doug Heaton United States
5/9/2014 6:52:28 AM #

I read your article with some interest.  Very thoughtful, but you have mischaracterized Mr Ivory and the
American Lands Council.  The transfer of Public Lands is a first step in wrenching the control of our
Public Lands from an inept and bankrupt Federal fiasco and placing ownership in the hands of States.  That is not what the Founders intended, which was property in private hands, but it is a first step in getting control closer to the people.  Privatization is not an immediate political possibility as the Sage Brush Rebellion proved.  The people who should have supported it, killed it beause the Rancher feared privatizatioin would extinguish their grazing leases, miners would lose their claims, and outdoor recreationalists would lose access to the open lands...they killed it.  This transfer would force the Fed to honor the trust promise to extinguish title as they were bound to do.  It isn't perfect but it is a start.  As for the allegation that Mr Ivory is secretly working to establish Agenda 21...That is rediculous.  Agenda 21 is a fatal destination to liberty and The American Lands Council knows it and is doing all it can to thwart that agenda.  Either you have not studied the purposes of ALC, or you're hopelessly paraniod, or you are an environmental plant to disrupt the progress of an organization that is dedicated to the preservation of Liberty.  The Transfer is the only solution big enough...and it's a thoughtful approach to the problem of continued Federal ownership which may actually be politically possible.  If you truely are interested in solutions that slow the rush to tyranny, you ought to stop aardvarkaardvarkinating your allies.  

Reply

Defending Utah
Defending Utah United States
5/22/2014 1:11:55 PM #

If ALC is anti-agenda 21, then I look forward to whatever information you may present that will clear the concerns brought up in this article.

Reply

ChanLanza
ChanLanza United States
1/18/2015 1:36:35 AM #

He's right, in your rush to defend I didn't hear one thing provided in evidence to the contrary of the major concerns eloquently researched and exhibited in this article.

Reply

Pingbacks and trackbacks (2)+

Add comment

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading

Ammon Bundy Event

Defending Utah Radio

Click for multiple ways to listen DU radio Listen to Defending Utah Radio
Political Talk and Liberty Music

Podcast archives available at: www.spreaker.com/user/defendingutah

Constitution Made Easy

CyberGhost VPN - Privatize Your Web

CyberGhost VPN

Concerned about your family's privacy online?

  • Don't let your Internet Provider spy on you
  • Hide Your IP
  • Safe Online Transactions
  • Block Malicious Content
  • Fully Encrypted Internet (Your ISP and Wifi spies can't monitor you)
  • Protect all your devices

Membership

VidAngel

Liberty Classroom

Month List

FileSystemManager