We all know the left uses name calling as a way to smear and silence critics, "racist" being their favorite. Who cares if the accusation is correct as long as it helps to silence their critics, right?
Thanks to MSNBC, we all know that Socialist is code for the “N” word.
Error rendering Vimeo Viewer: Input string was not in a correct format.
And now, again thanks to MSNBC, we know that the people carrying these “assault weapons” are also racists, and probably members of the militia.
"A man (known only as Chris B) at a pro-health care reform rally...wore a semiautomatic assault rifle on his shoulder and a pistol on his hip....there are questions about whether this has racial overtones.... Here we have a man of color in the Presidency, and white people showing up with guns strapped to their wastes." We also learn that these people are mad about a black person being president, and we are going to see someone try and do him harm, because of this anger towards having a black President.”
What would we do without the mainstream media? We would all likely be lost and confused as to who and what kind of people are behind this “violent” “anger”.
Now, all kidding aside, who was this black hating racist? Why did MSNBC only show his back? Could it be because if they showed the full picture, it might challenge the story they had already written in advance?
What? How could showing the face of one of these white racist African-American haters challenge their story?
Maybe because this is Chris:
Chris is a clean cut young man, whom the media could not label racist or paint as some back woods hick. As collectivists, compelled to group people together based on race or how one looks, this must have been one of the most frustrating news events these mainstream news reporters had ever come across Those reporters must have been livid to see someone defending the Constitution, whom they could not put into some preconstructed box.
How could I make such a jaded claim? The first photo of Chris taken by mainstream outlets leaves out any view of Chris’ skin; a search of the online edition of the Arizona Republic has no photos of Chris, even though the above articles show plenty of photos. To top it off, the MSNBC video discussing the event only shows that same obstructed view and makes references to racism and not wanting a black person to be president.
If anyone claims there is no malice in the media towards the lovers of freedom or even bias in general, please share with them this clear example of animosity towards anyone exercising their rights contrary to the will of the power elite.
Those on the right would never stoop to such tactics though... would they?
Oh... I guess they would... and with thousands of others supporting it.
The accusation doesn't even make sense. The lie of man made global warming (my car is causing the ice caps on Mars to melt too?) doesn't just hurt black people, the assumption made if you accept it as racist, it hurts everyone.
Additionally, anti-science man-made global warming cultists are not limited to the Al Gore tint of skin pigmentation. In fact, the BLACK Entertainment Television (BET) did a piece on black environmentalists they think we should all know about.
We know that scientists who disagree with the theory of man-made climate changed are shunned and silenced, and scientists are starting to fight back, and we know that the claims are being used to justify enslaving mankind, so why stoop to calling someone a racist to get your point across?
It's time to start thinking right and wrong, not right and left.