<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Restore the Caucus &#8211; Take Action, Elections. SB54 is Still Hurting	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2022/10/17/restore-the-caucus-take-action-sb54-is-still-hurting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2022/10/17/restore-the-caucus-take-action-sb54-is-still-hurting/</link>
	<description>Think Right &#38; Wrong, Not Right &#38; Left</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:11:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Enoch Moore		</title>
		<link>https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2022/10/17/restore-the-caucus-take-action-sb54-is-still-hurting/#comment-41528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enoch Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.defendingutah.org/?p=8419#comment-41528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2022/10/17/restore-the-caucus-take-action-sb54-is-still-hurting/#comment-41527&quot;&gt;james&lt;/a&gt;.

Your confusion goes back to a lack of understanding the different between a pure democracy and the republic we have that is based on representation. The caucus system determines the will of the people in a superior manner through a representative chosen by small neighborhoods, who is dedicated to spend a lot of their personal time making sure the candidates are truly what the people want. That takes time and work that most people don&#039;t have, but a dedicated representative can give on behalf of the neighborhood. Your analogy of a popularity contest is actually more accurate for the new signature gathering route or any democratic process where the people don&#039;t actually know the candidate.  People choose who they like based on passing recognition of a name, slogan or superficial reputation, instead of learning if they truly stand for what they say they stand for.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2022/10/17/restore-the-caucus-take-action-sb54-is-still-hurting/#comment-41527">james</a>.</p>
<p>Your confusion goes back to a lack of understanding the different between a pure democracy and the republic we have that is based on representation. The caucus system determines the will of the people in a superior manner through a representative chosen by small neighborhoods, who is dedicated to spend a lot of their personal time making sure the candidates are truly what the people want. That takes time and work that most people don&#8217;t have, but a dedicated representative can give on behalf of the neighborhood. Your analogy of a popularity contest is actually more accurate for the new signature gathering route or any democratic process where the people don&#8217;t actually know the candidate.  People choose who they like based on passing recognition of a name, slogan or superficial reputation, instead of learning if they truly stand for what they say they stand for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: james		</title>
		<link>https://www.defendingutah.org/post/2022/10/17/restore-the-caucus-take-action-sb54-is-still-hurting/#comment-41527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.defendingutah.org/?p=8419#comment-41527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From what I saw this year, the old caucus system is no better than a high school popularity contest.  When the candidate (who also garnered signatures) won his convention seat, by a very wide margin, then lost at the primary.  This candidate insinuated that the will of the people meant less than the result of the convention.  
He is now a write-in candidate and doing everything to smear the person who won the primary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I saw this year, the old caucus system is no better than a high school popularity contest.  When the candidate (who also garnered signatures) won his convention seat, by a very wide margin, then lost at the primary.  This candidate insinuated that the will of the people meant less than the result of the convention.<br />
He is now a write-in candidate and doing everything to smear the person who won the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
