If you’re like me, you have noticed some strange land, water, and agriculture moves in Utah. Some are in the right direction, while others cause great alarm. In this blog, I’m going to do a quick rundown of what several of us in Utah call the “Green Agenda.” It starts with rewilding.
Rewilding and Depopulation what does it mean?
“As explained in our guide to rewilding in Britain, this term “basically means returning the landscape to a wilder state,” though not necessarily to a “pristine state of wilderness.” The idea is essentially that human intervention has altered landscapes and ecosystems, but that this doesn’t have to be a permanent change. By removing human intervention to whatever extent possible — and sometimes via some extra efforts like planting or fencing off areas — we can prepare pieces of our environment to be reclaimed by nature. At that point, the natural world can begin to act on its own with regard to growth, regeneration, predation, grazing, decomposition, and more. The world, or at least pockets of it at a time, can go back to spinning along without so much direct human impact.” source
Some of you may know about Dennis Meadows and his depopulation plan; incase you do not, here is a video and description below:
It’s very important that you watch all 4 of these clips – Mr. Meadows says the quiet part out loud. He mentions that he hopes the population can decline in a “civil way.” He essentially would prefer carrot to the stick, but if stick is necessary so be it. He quite literally equates liberty and consumption together with population. If you want more liberty and consumption, you must have less people. According to Meadows, if you don’t figure out how to quell population growth the result will be living with far less liberty and consumption. He then argues for “equity” of resources, as does communism.
You can read his book here – source in the comments below, I’d love to hear your thoughts.
In short, he argues that we need less people and while we’re at it, let’s force the humans into “habitats” so “rewilding” can take place. He equates humans on the same level as animals and no better than dirt. In his view mother nature (Gaia) is more valuable than all. Utah Freedom Coalition has a great page with the UN documents on human habitats here and Henry Lamb does an overall great breakdown of the plan here.
One Health and Utah
This all really comes home under “One Health” and Utah has its very own collaboration for this project. Who needs the World Health Organization to do the bad guys bidding when Utah can do it?
Sources- https://extension.usu.edu/one-health/
“One Health” is the planet, animals, and humans all living “equitably” – or worse for humans. This is done under the guise of protecting us all from contamination, pandemics, and measuring value.
Utahgovreports.org has some easy to read and understand pages on this – specifically Utah’s role. You can read it here.
You will start to notice everything moving under “One Health” that leads to “One Earth” or “One Planet.” What do you need to control this? A “One World Order.” Whoops, looks like those conspiracy theorists were right… again.
Does the below sound familiar? Much like Envision Utah and QGET? What has Utah agreed to, what are they agreeing to now, and how do we stop it?
Did you consent to any of this? I don’t recall consenting.
Wildlife and Land Conservation and what iT REALLY MEANS
This can be summed up with one word: CONTROL. Let’s break it down. In the below screenshot, you can see how early this “conservation” movement started. In 1948, only a few short years after the United Nations formed in 1945 or reformed from the League of Nations, you can see how early “One” became key to their language set.
It’s important that you can follow the timeline that Escape Key lays out in the above-mentioned source. It’s a long article but a critical one.
Some key points:
- Conservation Foundation now goes by Wildlife Conservation Society
- “‘STATE AND NATIONAL PARKS, MONUMENTS AND WILDERNESS AREAS are set aside exclusively for study and recreation by authority of law because they have unique scenic, historic, scientific or recreational value.”
- The above led to UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (yes Utah is involved)
- Rockefeller’s join the agenda fully – “Future Environments of North America” 1965 book.
- “Convention on Biological Diversity’s 12 Malawi Principles. It broadly describes their desired future political system which isn’t wholly dissimilar to feudalism.”
- More Rockefeller, and then, boom we have Al Gore and John Kerry and the “Green Mafia” (1989)
-
“Wild Earth emphasized conservation biology, science, and wilderness proposals, and a style rooted in the conservationism movement. Wild Earth was published quarterly.[2]
At first, Wild Earth was solely a magazine. The publisher was Cenozoic Society, Inc.[2] Later, a new environmental group, the Wildlands Project, was formed and the magazine became the official periodical of the Wildlands Project.
Wild Earth ceased publication in 2004 due to budgetary concerns at the Wildlands Project, as the magazine became increasingly unprofitable to publish and other priorities at the organization were deemed more important than subsidizing a magazine which was no longer profitable. Wild Earth emphasized conservation biology, science, and wilderness proposals, and a style rooted in the conservationism movement. Wild Earth was published quarterly.[2]
At first, Wild Earth was solely a magazine. The publisher was Cenozoic Society, Inc.[2] Later, a new environmental group, the Wildlands Project, was formed and the magazine became the official periodical of the Wildlands Project.
Wild Earth ceased publication in 2004 due to budgetary concerns at the Wildlands Project, as the magazine became increasingly unprofitable to publish and other priorities at the organization were deemed more important than subsidizing a magazine which was no longer profitable.” Source Wikipedia and here is a Wild Earth Genoizoic Society
- In 1992 and 1997 things get wild. Here is one of the most thorough outlines I could find on it from 1997. This is from the United Nations Environmental Program’s very own website. Here is an archived page: Seoul Declaration on Environmental Ethics, “People’s Pledge.”
- Spirituality/religion becomes nature instead of God or any other higher being.
- Environmental “equity”—” communism”—redistribution of wealth
- “Greening of Technology”—look no further than “renewable energy,” which in Utah is having devastating effects (more on that later)
- “Coordination” between government, businesses, NGOs, and more. So, fascism – source
- Enlibra- Utah Freedom Coalition did a great job at a high level view here (it’s from a former governor of Utah, and it’s awful) (2003)
- NACs- Natural Asset Company’s (ESG on crack) enters the game in 2023 (Utah is SUPER into these)
- Between all these things, we have the “clean water act” and the “clean air” policies and “wildlife/land” and a gazillion other horrendous pieces of legislation and mandates.
- If you can find EcoFreedom from the 1990s blogs (they’ve been nearly all wiped), they did a great job breaking all this down. Read those if possible. Reminder again, to watch the Henry Lambs video we posted earlier: it’s important here.
Okay this gets you started. Now, let’s get into some pieces of Utah.
From Jade One (Facebook)
“The UN issued several policies at the 1992 Earth Summit, one of which was the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
Compliance with this UN policy is being driven and managed by the Wildlands Network which shares the same goals as the CBD; to set aside half the land in America for animals.” https://www.cbd.int/
Where do you think the Wildland Network moved their headquarters to in 2020? If you guessed Utah, you would be correct. To give you a really good idea of what’s been happening with these guys, let’s look at the screenshots below:
Some important sources for you all to read-
https://nwri.org/the-wildlands-project/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildlands_Network
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1856&context=dlr
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=polisci_fac
https://www.agenda21course.com/lesson-3-wildlands-project/
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/rewilding/mission.html
https://wildlandsconservation.org/
With their own admission of being successful at passing some form of legislation back in 2020, can you imagine what they have been able to achieve since then? Their influence in water, land, energy, and agriculture, among other things, is likely very significant. The amount of bills passing in Utah that are taking away people’s access and rights to all the above should be of great concern. Prepare60 in Utah wants UNIVERSAL smart meters. Why? They can measure water usage now with analog. Why would they want a central location to shut off water – possibly remotely? There is a push to centralize everything in Utah. What does centralization lead to? It leads to total control in the hands of very few and takes away any control local governments have. What does that sound like to you?
WHAT HAPPENED TO UTAH’S LAND?
As many of you know, Mike Leavitt did the largest (at the time, may still be) land swap with the federal government in the continental USA history. SITLA as it’s known. A few days ago, a deal being touted as giving land to local “entities” may have furthered the loss of Utah land. Below, is the Deseret News touting the most recent land swap secured by Sen. John Curtis and Rep. Celeste Maloy as a good thing, is it?
BlueRibbon Coalition appears to think it’s not a great thing. You can read their complaint here
Much like the narrative around SITLA; down the line Utah may realize they got played on this land deal as well. We will have to see what happens. Just a reminder that they have actively worked to install NGOs and P3s on local levels, so as not to be top-down mandates but bottom up as well.
An example of that is the Sentinel Landscapes, which link directly up with Biden’s American the Beautiful, which DOES link right up with the UN. Whoops, once again the conspiracy theorists were right.
These sentinel landscapes are linked to the DOD, as noted in this article by our (USA) very own defense.gov website. You can read more about the Sentinel Landscapes and conservation here.
Breeauna Sagdal sums up the sentinel landscapes quite accurately here, specifically around agriculture. Does this sound good for Utah? Does this sound like we are giving away more of our land to federal control?
It is important that you understand the sentinel landscapes are just one of their workarounds. They had created the below Utah30x30 but this was a bit too obvious and they got called out. The website is still up though, so are they really gone? We’d argue no.
Source and 30×30 Utah principles
Please understand that the support for 30×30 is very high in Utah and it’s very much alive and well — no matter what the politicians say. This website confirms it.
Last but not least look at the below:
“Rewilding of North American sites carries global conservation implications.”
Do you all see the problem here? It encroaches on sovereignty. Our Constitutional Republic form of government does not allow for this massive globalization and centralized one world order, nor should it. There need to be serious questions asked in Utah, and they need to be asked immediately.
At any rate, I will stop here to give you time to digest. There is more, a lot more about this that needs to be dug into, but this should give you a good place to start.
————————-
Want Solutions? Learn to nullify at the local level.
Defending Utah mentors leaders, activists and individuals all across Utah in defending all rights, including water rights.
Action items:
– Join our mailing list
– Read about the founding father’s pattern in committees of safety
– Join or become a supporter of Defending Utah
5 Responses
At my initial glance, it reads like the work of Satan’s minions.
I was thinking the same.
The entire population of the world can fit in the state of Texas, on livible land, an acre for each person and still have a lot of land left over. These people are evil!
According to Wikipedia the area of the state of Texas is 268,596 square miles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas).
268,596 sq mi*640 acre/sq mi=171,901,440 acres.
171,901,440 acres/8,000,000,000 people=0.0215 acres/person.
This is less than one forty-fifth of an acre of land per person if everyone were in Texas.
I’m an earth scientist. There’s no such thing as a “climate crisis,” it’s pure nonsense made up by globalists for their agenda. The Earth’s climate has wildly fluctuated for a very long time and our activities make barely any difference.
It can’t both be true, quite obviously, that (1) so much life is going extinct right now that it’s comparable to major extinction events of the past, and this is a disaster, and humans are to blame, but (2) life forms that we raise for humans (cattle, chickens, pigs, etc) are destroying the planet.
If their argument is that life is destroying the planet, then their agenda is for there to be no life at all, and to claim this is best. They even argue that produce should not be grown either, and that this also somehow destroys the Earth, and that all agriculture needs to end. Bill Gates has literally proposed burying millions of trees to fight climate change. When if CO2 and greenhouse gas theory are correct (they are not), trees would be a solution.
This is so obviously of the devil, it’s incredible anyone who knows about the devil is fooled.